[feedback20] Comments on "Advertising 2.0"

"Advertising 2.0": commented by Axel Toelke

Axel Toelke — jeu, 08 nov 2007 19:11:23 +0100

I agree with the above posters. Nate's presentation was great and had some very intersting data (with the promise of more to come). Axel's segment was really a sales-pitch for SevenLoad, which I found to be out of place. I also question the CPM numbers he presented for SevenLoad, which is essentially user-generated content after all.

"Advertising 2.0": commented by sebastian marcu

sebastian marcu — jeu, 08 nov 2007 14:03:06 +0100

Nate Elliott gave a great presentation. Finally some real data. I waited 4 days for this...:-))

"Advertising 2.0": commented by Travis J. Todd

Travis J. Todd — jeu, 08 nov 2007 13:34:49 +0100

agree with the above comment. It was interesting though to see two almost contradictory viewpoints. Maybe a debate format would have been more appropriate. The data preseted by jupiter seemed completely honest and reliably untampered and unbiased. Great stuff!

"Advertising 2.0": commented by Dejah Meldem

Dejah Meldem — jeu, 08 nov 2007 10:44:19 +0100

... but the Jupiter Research presentation is right on target! This is the type of info we want. Give us data that we can learn from and use the sites that exist as examples. This should have been one of the key notes.

"Advertising 2.0": commented by Dejah Meldem

Dejah Meldem — jeu, 08 nov 2007 10:37:41 +0100

This is an interesting topic - but why did sevenload come in and give us a sales pitch?! That is bad practice at a conference!

"Advertising 2.0": commented by Brady Forrest

Brady Forrest — dim, 04 nov 2007 23:00:05 +0100

How did you find the session ? Please give us your feedback by voting and making comments.